Ed Casey, Alex Akerman, and Brian Boone are noted for representing Southern California Edison in successfully opposing a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court to review a U.S. Ninth Circuit decision dismissing a lawsuit challenging the company’s storage of spent nuclear fuel at its decommissioned San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.
In the News
December 6, 2021
Law360 | Justices Won’t Review Challenge to Nuke Plant Shuttering
Related News & Insights
-
In the News December 6, 2021Bloomberg Law | Justices Turn Down California Nuclear Waste Cleanup CaseAlston & Bird is noted for representing Southern California Edison in successfully opposing a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court to review a U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling dismissing a lawsuit challenging the company’s storage of spent nuclear fuel at its decommissioned San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.
-
Advisories February 20, 2025Education Advisory | How College Legal Departments Can Prepare for Changes in Student-Athletes’ Employment StatusOur Education Group discusses how college and university legal counsel can track and prepare for changes in student-athletes’ employment status.
-
Advisories June 8, 2023Securities Litigation Advisory: The Supreme Court Maintains Limitations on 1933 Act Claims for Direct ListingsOur Securities Litigation Group reviews the Supreme Court’s Slack opinion that upheld decades of case law requiring a narrow reading of Section 11 of the 1933 Act.
-
Advisories March 1, 2023Labor & Employment Advisory: Ninth Circuit Green-Lights Employers’ Continued Use of Mandatory Arbitration Agreements in CaliforniaOur Labor & Employment Group examines why the Ninth Circuit reversed itself and ruled that the Federal Arbitration Act preempts a California law that prohibited arbitration agreements as a condition of employment.
-
January 27, 2023“High Court Slack Case Not Likely to Broadly Affect Issuers,” Law360, January 27, 2023.This article analyzes the most recent appeal heard by the U.S. Supreme Court involving federal securities laws, Slack Technologies v. Pirani, which deals with the question of whether companies face potential liability under the 1933 Act for shares made available to the public via a direct listing.
Media Contact